IJATT CASE STUDY

No matter how alike 2 athletes appear, each has unique characteristics: With the transition to the professional master’s degree for athletic trainers, the case study may also have renewed value as an educational tool by connecting budding clinicians to the research world, mitigating the distance and perceived differences between them. A no-fault error is a clinical reasoning error that occurred because the needed information was not in the practicing clinician’s scope of knowledge. In the quest for scientific credibility, we may have inadvertently caused clinicians to feel as though their observations and insights may not hold adequate merit. The expectation for the published external evidence is that it was performed at a high level eg, rigorous control, low expectations of bias, clearly defined population of interest. Systematic guidelines, recommendations, or reporting requirements were inconsistent or nonexistent in the scientific health case study literature.

Despite concerns about the internal and external validity of case studies with regard to the inherent biases introduced by only 1 patient or a few patients, case studies serve as educational narratives for the development of new insights in clinical practice, education, and research. The sports medicine body of knowledge can be substantially enhanced through the reporting of clinical outcomes generated by evidence-based clinical decisions. All of the patients were collegiate-level varsity track-and-field sprinters or long jumpers. Horses and unicorns and zebras, oh my! An essential component of the exploration CASE report is the reporting of the critical key feature s that led to the clinical decisions and outcomes. We have defined unique to describe the atypical presentation of key features as previously presented in the literature associated with the case. As with individual CASE reports, 4 key features of the athletes’ specific cases, the taping technique that allowed them to participate fully and symptom free, and discussion of the outcomes of this case series would be expected.

A strong emphasis on comparing and contrasting the major elements of the validation case report with those of the previously published studies validation case report patient with previous study participants, similarities in interventions cwse outcomes, discussion of interpretations would be expected. A model for unique versus rare case studies.

  ACTIVITY 3.2H UNIT CONVERSION HOMEWORK ANSWERS

It is now a premier source of clinically and laboratory-based research in the realm of athletic training and sports medicine. In contrast, exploration CASE reports describe clinical decision outcomes that were based predominantly on internal evidence individual clinical experience within the professional body of knowledge.

The P and the I stay relatively the same; the C and O are where the revision makes sense. Purpose The purpose of validation CASE reports is to test the results of published stury evidence in casw actual clinical environment on an individual patient.

Clinical Contributions to the Available Sources of Evidence (CASE) Reports: Executive Summary

The role of the validation case report is to complete the circle of clinical research evidence by testing the effectiveness and feasibility of an outcome in real life.

Provide a framework for advancing the current perspectives for the key features associated with the condition of interest and warrants at least investigation at the next level of evidence case series Level 4: However, the taping cass ie, the therapeutic intervention in this case defined the uniqueness.

For exploration CASE reports or series, the comparative outcome should reference the patient presentation that is atypical caae what is currently provided in the literature. Validation CASE reports describe clinical decision outcomes that were guided by the best available research evidence.

Clinical Contributions to the Available Sources of Evidence (CASE) Reports: Executive Summary

The expectation for the published external evidence is that it was performed at a high level eg, rigorous control, low expectations of bias, clearly defined population of interest. Rare Event Example A collegiate female athlete without any traumatic injury, who was taking oral contraceptives and who traveled by airplane to a competition, developed a deep vein thrombosis DVT 1 week after the trip. The sports medicine body of knowledge can be substantially enhanced through the reporting of clinical outcomes generated by evidence-based clinical decisions.

Systematic guidelines, recommendations, or reporting requirements were inconsistent or nonexistent in the scientific health case study literature. The PICO fits nicely into this ojatt paradigm with a small revision.

Advantages and drawbacks to implementation were also reported. Clinicians are innovative and forward thinkers. Beyond Diagnosis Case studies are a critical link between the best available research evidence and clinical practice. In the broader medical literature, case studies provide a medium for describing new conditions, their potential etiologic factors, prognostic timelines, and potentially advantageous therapeutic strategies.

  BART HOMPES THESIS

Clinical Case Study as a Clinical Communication Tool

Clinical thinking, evidence, communication, and decisionmaking. Further, clinical communication is enhanced when we go beyond the unusual diagnosis. Open in a separate window.

ijatt case study

Studies that address diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic, and etiologic factors would all be acceptable. This interprofessional interaction is critically important and should be highlighted within the case.

ijatt case study

All of the patients were collegiate-level varsity track-and-field sprinters or long jumpers. The type of evidence stuxy by exploration case studies is the framework for advancing the current perspectives on key features associated with the condition of interest, warranting further investigation.

These rare event 7 CASE reports would afford clinicians information regarding a condition that may be relevant to ATs but may not currently be found specifically within the athletic training body of knowledge.

Clinical Case Study as a Clinical Communication Tool

Present a condition that is relevant to the athletic trainer and that has been documented in other literature. Evidence-based practice or practice-based evidence: Exploration CASE series present compelling, practice-based unique evidence across multiple patients.

Indeed, all sources of external evidence observational, diagnostic, prognostic, etiologic, therapeutic, etc can be used in the new Clinical CASE Report paradigm. Provide evidence for athletic trainers interacting with other health care professionals for making decisions associated with a condition that is not prevalent in physically active populations.

This clinician took care to determine the similarities between the current patient and the study participants. The interprofessional capacity in which other health care professionals were involved and interacted with ATs throughout the case in making clinical decisions should be presented.

Author: admin